2.\tAnd speaking of freedom，is not the author free，as few men are free? Is he not secure，as few men are secure? The tools of his industry are so common and so cheap that they have almost ceased to have commercial value. He needs no bulky pile of raw material，no elaborate apparatus，no service of men or animals. He is dependent for his occupation upon no one but himself, and nothing outside him that matters. He is the sovereign of an empire，self-supporting，self-contained. No one can sequestrate his estates. No one can deprive him of his stock in trade；no one can force him to exercise his faculty against his will；no one can prevent him exercising it as he chooses. Thee pen is the great liberator of men and nations. No chains can bind，no poverty can choke，no tariff can re-strict the free play of his mind，and even the “Times” Book Club can only exert a moderately depressing influence upon his rewards. Whether his work is good or bad，so long as he does his best he is happy. I often fortify myself amid the uncertainties and vexations of political life by believing that I possess a line of retreat into a peaceful and fertile country where no rascal can pursue anywhere one need never be dull or idle or even wholly without power. It is then，indeed，that I feel devoutly thankful to have been born fond of writing. It is then，indeed，that I feel grateful to all the brave and generous spirits who，in every age and in every land，have fought to establish the now un-questioned freedom of the pen.
3.\tAnd what a noble medium the English language is. It is not possible to write a page without experiencing positive pleasure at the richness and variety，the flexibility and the profoundness of our mother tongue.If an English writer cannot saywhat he has to say in English，and in simple English，depend upon it is probably not worth saying. What a pity it is that English is not more generally studied. I am not going to attack classical education. No one who has the slightest pretensio